2018-08-31

CNN:EMPLOYED BY CHINA

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2018/08/world/china-africa-ethiopia-manufacturing-jobs-intl

  Employed by China

EMPLOYED BY CHINA

It's often assumed that the Chinese in Africa 'bring their own' and don't hire locals. In Ethiopia, that's not the case -- but will it lift the country out of poverty? Words, video and images by Jenni Marsh, CNN

The assembly line at Huajian International Shoe City, Addis Ababa.

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia — Zhang Huarong points out of his office window to a bleak block of grey portacabins at the Huajian International Shoe City, in Addis Ababa. "That is what I lived in for six months when I came to Africa," he says. "I am 60 years old. Back in China, I am a wealthy man -- my house in Dongguan even has a swimming pool. But I chose to come here and do something very difficult."

In 2011, this self-made textile tycoon from Jiangxi province became one of the first Chinese entrepreneurs to heed the call of Ethiopia's then-Prime Minister Meles Zenawi to open a factory in his country. Within three months, Huajian was producing footwear for giants such as Nine West, Guess and, later, Ivanka Trump's fashion line, before it closed.

"This is something God is telling me to do," Zhang (pictured below) says, framing himself as a 21st-century manufacturing missionary whose goal is to create more than 100,000 jobs in the poorest parts of Africa. Rwanda is next. "In China, no one wants to make shoes anymore," he adds.

Ethiopia is undoubtedly one of the continent's poorest countries, but that's changing. In the decade leading up to 2016, Ethiopia's economy swelled 10% a year making it the fastest growing in Africa. And with 100 million people, 70% of whom are under age 30, it also has the continent's second-largest population. That's both a massive demographic dividend and a real risk: with unemployment at 16.8%, jobs are urgently required.

Businessmen like Zhang are seen as the country's ticket out of poverty. Huajian employs 7,500 local workers at its two enormous factories in the Addis Ababa region. "As long as they have the right skills and training, Africans are just like Asians and Europeans," he says.

Huajian makes shoes exclusively for American clients.

As one of the biggest Chinese employers in Ethiopia, Huajian has attracted intense scrutiny. Reports last year of poor working conditions at the firm's Guangdong factory, in China, and rock bottom wages in Addis Ababa saw two customers, one of whom was Trump, jump ship.

While many of the criticisms were valid, Huajian is operating in an environment of deep Western suspicion of the Chinese in Africa. In March, Rex Tillerson, then secretary of state, told leaders at the African Union, in Addis Ababa, that Chinese investors "do not bring significant job creation locally." His comments echoed warnings about neo-colonialism in Africa and Chinese labor importation by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, respectively.

"China is a rising economy, and it's going to be the global number one by 2030 latest," says Arkebe Oqubay, a senior government official and architect of much of Ethiopia's industrialization strategy. "There's always rivalry when a great power diminishes. But we as the Africans are the ones to say if we are benefiting from China. We don't need a witness."

About 4,000 Ethiopian workers are employed at the Huajian International Shoe City, Addis Ababa.

'Even my father doesn't like being a farmer'

When Emaway Gashaw was 18 years old, she got on a bus and waved goodbye to her large family of coffee farmers. The journey from Jimma, in western Ethiopia, to Addis Ababa took 10 hours. She wound up in Jemo, a suburb of the capital that a decade ago was countryside but today is dotted by concrete condos housing rural migrants looking for work, including her elder cousin. "When I got here, I didn't have any opportunities so I took this job," she says. Emaway is a leather skiver at the Huajian International Light Industry City, a 1.5 million-square-meter industrial park that, will eventually provide housing, hospitals and schooling onsite, employ 100,000 workers, and within 10 years create $4 billion in revenue, according to the company.

The Jemo area of Addis Ababa is becoming increasingly urban.

From 8 a.m. until 5 p.m., Emaway forms part of a sprawling assembly line inside a brightly lit, air-conditioned shed that looks like a giant aircraft hangar. But her wages allow for little. "I get paid 1,200 birr ($44) a month with overtime," she says. "After rent and food, there is nothing left. My cousin has to support me."

Emaway is one of the lowest-paid workers at the factory. Getachew Tilanun, 20, is from a family of maize farmers in Welega, where Ethiopia borders South Sudan in the west. After working at the factory for two years, he has been promoted twice and now earns 2,500 birr (about $90) a month, and receives three meals a day and the chance to live onsite for subsidized rent.

Unlike 90% of International Labour Organization member states, Ethiopia has no minimum wage. The international poverty line is about $57 a month.

Emaway Gashaw, 18 years old, has worked at Huajian for nine months.

"For my wage, I have a lot of responsibility," he says, explaining that he oversees 100 workers, including 11 line supervisors. "If they make mistakes, my wages get docked." Getachew has taught himself to speak Chinese to give himself "unique" employment skills. "I tried to find out everything I could about China on the internet," he says. "When I saw Asian people, I just tried to speak to them."

His work is tough, but the alternative is worse. "Even my father doesn't like being a farmer," Getachew says. "It's the job of the very uneducated."

Just 1% of the 4,000 workers at the Jemo factory are Chinese, says Bonn Liang, a manager who was headhunted from Dongguan one year ago. "But in the future, we will all go back to China," he adds.

That's already happened at the Sino-Ethiop Associate pharmaceutical factory in Dukem, south of Addis. A joint venture between two Chinese and one Ethiopian firm, the facility has 177 employees, only one of whom is Chinese. "In our first year, some Ethiopian workers were sent to China for training, and about 50 Chinese experts came here," says Andrew Shegaw, the factory manager. "Now we are 100% independent." The factory employs Ethiopian pharmacists, engineers, and electricians, who received workplace training from the Chinese to supplement their academic knowledge.

A worker at the Sino-Ethiop Associate pharmaceutical factory in Dukem.

Contrary to popular belief, these scenarios are not unusual. A groundbreaking McKinsey report last year, which surveyed more than 1,000 Chinese companies in construction, manufacturing, trade, real estate, and services in eight African countries, including Ethiopia, found that on average 89% of employees were African. Several million African jobs had been created by China on the continent. Nearly two-thirds of Chinese companies provided skills training, while half offered apprenticeships, and a third had introduced a new technology.

It was the first time a large-scale dataset on Chinese hiring practices in Africa had been made available, and it rebutted the criticisms voiced by Tillerson. "I believe that (his claim) was very short-sighted," Arkebe says. "It's hard to believe a secretary of state was misinformed."

'It's a matter of patriotism … and ego'

The China-Africa relationship has only made headlines in the past decade, but it can be traced back to the mid-20th century when Beijing began befriending newly independent states. In 1968, China -- then a poor nation -- spent the equivalent of $3 billion in today's money on constructing the Tanzam Railway, which linked landlocked Zambia to the port of Dar es Salaam in Tanzania. Britain, the United States and the United Nations had all passed on the project. China's help didn't come for free. At that time, Taiwan -- not Beijing -- held a coveted seat on the UN Security Council. When China reclaimed that seat in 1971, 26 of the 76 votes came from Africa.

Fast forward a few decades, and China has pulled off a jaw-dropping economic boom. "African leaders saw China go from being an economy on its knees, with a poor, rural, uneducated population, to the second-largest economy in the world. That's concrete evidence that magic can happen," says Solange Chatelard, academic and research associate at the Université Libre de Bruxelles in Belgium.

By the late 1990s, Africa had dropped off the radar for the West, which associated the continent with poverty and the AIDS crisis, says Chatelard. "That's exactly when China was plotting its comeback." In Africa, China saw an opportunity for diplomacy and trade.

In 2000, the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) was launched in Beijing and has since become a triennial deal-making powwow between China and all African states. At FOCAC 2015, China pledged to invest $60 billion in Africa over the next three years.

Chinese president Xi Jinping speaks at the 2015 Forum on China-Africa Cooperation in South Africa. (Ihsaan Haffejee/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)

Claims that the Chinese are "colonizing" Africa, however, by exploiting its natural resources, land, and labor, are insulting to the victims of European colonization, which was based on spiritual control, brutal force and slavery, Chatelard says.

The Chinese, she explains, play to the local labor laws. In countries such as Angola and Algeria, for example, where the local government doesn't force the use of local labor, Chinese firms have taken the easiest road and used their own countrymen.

Meles decided early on that China could be useful in two ways. Firstly, in generating manufacturing jobs to mechanize its workforce and encourage knowledge transfer. Secondly, in building infrastructure, such as the Addis Ababa-Djibouti rail line, which cut the journey time for whisking goods from landlocked Ethiopia to the sea from days by road to 12 hours.

Arkebe clarifies that Ethiopia doesn't take Chinese loans for buildings such as football stadiums, unlike Zimbabwe, Senegal, and Angola.

The Chinese-built African Union.

The Addis Ababa Light Rail system -- built by the Chinese.

"The fact that we didn't encounter colonialism is important," says Belachew Fikre, commissioner of the Ethiopian Investment Commission, explaining his countrymen's mindset when dealing with foreign powers. Ethiopia is the only African nation to have never been colonized, bar a brief muscle-in by Italian dictator Benito Mussolini between 1935 and 1941. "It's a matter of patriotism and ego, too. You cannot order an Ethiopian about," he says.

Still, getting Chinese companies to invest wasn't easy at first. Conditions in Ethiopia 10 years ago were so poor and transportation links so bad that "to be honest, I did not think of investing here," says Zhang. It took Meles personally deploying his powers of persuasion to convince Zhang to open a factory in time for the opening ceremony of the African Union headquarters in January 2012, he says. The $200 million futuristic building was one of Beijing's largest gifts to Africa since the Tanzam railway. One year later, Chinese president Xi Jinping unveiled his Belt and Road initiative, a vast collection of interlinking trade deals and infrastructure projects throughout Africa, as well as Eurasia and the Pacific.

The Commercial Bank of Ethiopia will be the tallest building in Ethiopia when completed by China State Construction Engineering Corporation in 2020.

No McDonald's in Ethiopia

Today, it's not only the Chinese who have woken up to "Made in Ethiopia." In the lakeside town of Hawassa, the weekend playground of the Addis elite, a huge industrial park opened in 2016. American clothing giant PVH, whose brands include Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, and H&M, takes up a chunk of the 400,000 square-meter space.

Hawassa is one of 30 industrial parks that will have opened in Ethiopia by 2020. Mostly Chinese-built, these "areas of excellence" echo the Special Economic Zone model that turned Shenzhen into a manufacturing powerhouse within one generation.

As such, Ethiopia has been called the "China of Africa," and there are some undeniable parallels. The Solomonic dynasty, which ruled Ethiopian until Emperor Haile Selassie was overthrown in 1974, traced its roots -- somewhat suspectly -- directly back to King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba in 10th century BC; China claims to have 5,000 years of continuous history.

Emperor Haile Selassie meets Mao Zedong, Chairman of China's Communist Party, in London in 1960. (Keystone Press Agency/ZUMAPRESS)

In modern times, both countries had huge populations to mobilize into a poverty-alleviating workforce, endured a brutal Communist dictator, and have operated a notorious Great Firewall (the Ethiopian government frequently just turns the internet off). Neither tolerates dual citizenship, but Ethiopia offers its large diaspora an Ethiopian Origin card, just as China proffers the Home Return Permit for those of Chinese descent, stressing a sense of ethnic identity that goes beyond nationality.

Ethiopians bristle at the idea they are imitating China. "I will never characterize Ethiopia as a Chinese model," Belachew says. Delegates toured a range of industrialized nations to learn from their mistakes and inform Ethiopia's economic policy, he adds. "We looked at Chinese-built parks in Nigeria, and they were a disaster," says Arkebe. The zones lacked an energy supply, hadn't been woven into an economic strategy and, he says, "created peanuts" -- a claim the Lekki Free Zone rebutted in an email to CNN.

"I will never characterize Ethiopia as a Chinese model."

-- Belachew Fikre, commissioner of the Ethiopian Investment Commission

Ethiopia took note. Hawassa, which cost $300 million to build, is an eco-friendly facility with a reliable power supply, streamlined on-site visa and banking services and -- as in many other Ethiopian industrial parks -- amazing tax breaks: companies enjoy a 10-year tax holiday, expatriate staff pay no income tax for five years and exports are duty free.

The benefits are so unbelievable it is hard to see how Ethiopia will win.

Arkebe says the parks are designed to generate jobs not revenue. "For every manufacturing job created, 2.2 indirect jobs emerge," he says. Hawassa by itself could generate 46,000 roles. Unlike in West Africa, where Chinese-owned shops are common, Ethiopia doesn't give retail licenses to foreign investors. McDonald's and Starbucks are yet to arrive here.

On the ground, both Hawassa and Huajian have struggled with a workforce striking over low pay. "The workers here are still only a third as productive as in China," says Zhang. Ayele Gelan, an Ethiopian economist at the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, says wages paid by the likes of Huajian are not abnormal, it's just that Ethiopia has an "abysmally" low minimum wage for a developing country. An entry-level teacher would get paid seven times more in Nairobi, Kenya, than in Addis Ababa, for example, despite the cost of living in the Ethiopian capital being much higher, he says.

Patrick Belser, senior economist at the International Labour Office in Geneva, ILO, says his organization is preparing recommendations on an appropriate minimum wage for the Ethiopian government, which would address problems of absenteeism and high turnover. "It would be a win-win situation to have higher wages that increase the motivation and productivity of the workers," he says.

Where the Chinese management reside.

The living quarters of Huajian's Ethiopian staff.

At Huajian, as the day ends, workers pile into the giant canteen where the Chinese managers tuck into noodles and stir-fried meat, while the Ethiopian workers eat stews from injera bread in a separate area. Afterward, the locals file back to homes that resemble shipping containers, while the Chinese retire to quaint wooden chalets, which were imported from Canada. Does segregation like this, while perhaps unavoidable, fuel resentment?

Zhang pauses. "You know that 50 years ago, my family did not have enough money for food or even clothes. We were so poor. I started my company with three sewing machines in a very small workshop." On the flatscreen TV in his office, Zhang fires up the video to a song titled "China-Africa," which he says a Huajian employee wrote. A Chinese operatic vocalist sings:

"Huajian comes,
The Chinese and Africans work hand in hand like brothers,
The African dream of the African people ...
To build the One Belt, One Road dream.
Hold high the torch of hope!
Huajian comes."

It is almost evangelical and screened without a shred of irony.

When FOCAC reconvenes this September in Beijing, most African heads of state are expected to attend, and Abiy will be asking Beijing to send more Zhangs his way, according to ministers. "It's not easy for Chinese companies to come to Africa," Arkebe says. But with Africa's population projected to reach 2.5 billion by 2050, he believes it is essential for countries like his to attract investment now to ensure political stability on the continent. "Made in Ethiopia" in short, he says, is a label the whole world should get behind.

Editors: Stephanie Busari, Brad Lendon and Jo Parker, CNN

2018-03-02

Spring Lantern Festival

Spring Lantern Festival Is An Important Part Of Spring Festival Of China's Traditional Festival, And Marks The Official End Of The Long Holiday.

It Is Sure That The Origins Of Lantern Festival Arerelated To Ancient Humanity's Use Of Fire To Celebrate Festivals And Avert Disaster. On Lantern Festival People Go Outside To Have A Look At The Lanterns And Guess The Riddles On The Lanterns. Perhaps You Call See Some Wonderful Folk Performances,Dragon Dance And YangGe.

Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival

Any Special Food For The Lantern Festival?

It Is Small Dumpling Balls Made Of Glutinous Rice Flour With Rose Petals, Sesame, Bean Paste, Jujube Paste, Walnut Meat, Dried Fruit, Sugar And Edible Oil As Filling.


Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival  Windwing - Spring Lantern FestivalWindwing - Spring Lantern Festival
The Symbolism Of The Dumplings' Round Shape Is More Important Than The Taste.

Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival Windwing - Spring Lantern Festival
 Tang Dynasty Style Lady

2018-01-01

Northern Expedition Memorial -- ZhuGeLiang

http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMzI2NzMzNzU2NA==.html?spm=a2h0k.8191407.0.0&from=s1.8-1-1.2#paction

Windwing - Northern Expedition Memorial * ZhuGeLiang

Northern Expedition Memorial  --  ZhuGeLiang

Permit Me To Observe: The Late Emperor Was Taken From Us Before He Could Finish His Life's Work, The Restoration Of The Han. Today, The Empire Is Still Divided In Three, And Our Very Survival Is Threatened.

Yet Still The Officials At Court And The Soldiers Throughout The Realm Remain Loyal To You, Your Majesty. Because They Remember The Late Emperor, All Of Them, And They Wish To Repay His Kindness In Service To You.

This Is The Moment To Extend Your Divine Influence, To Honor The Memory Of The Late Emperor And Strengthen The Morale Of Your Officers. It Is Not The Time To Listen To Bad Advice, Or Close Your Ears To The Suggestions Of Loyal Men.

The Emperors Of The Western Han Chose Their Courtiers Wisely, And Their Dynasty Flourished. The Emperors Of The Eastern Han Chose Poorly, And They Doomed The Empire To Ruin.

Whenever The Late Emperor Discussed This Problem With Me, He Lamented The Failings Of Emperors Huan And Ling.

……

I Began As A Common Man, Farming In My Fields In Nanyang, Doing What I Could To Survive In An Age Of Chaos. I Never Had Any Interest In Making A Name For Myself As A Noble.

The Late Emperor Was Not Ashamed To Visit My Cottage And Seek My Advice. Grateful For His Regard, I Responded To His Appeal And Threw Myself Into His Service.

The Late Emperor Always Appreciated My Caution And, In His Final Days, Entrusted Me With His Cause.

Since That Moment, I Have Been Tormented Day And Night By The Fear That I Might Let Him Down. That Is Why I Crossed The Lu River At The Height Of Summer, And Entered The Wastelands Beyond.

Now The South Has Been Subdued, And Our Forces Are Fully Armed. I Should Lead Our Soldiers To Conquer The Northern Heartland And Attempt To Remove The Hateful Traitors, Restore The House Of Han, And Return It To The Former Capital.

This Is The Way I Mean To Honor My Debt To The Late Emperor And Fulfill My Duty To You.

My Only Desire Is To Be Permitted To Drive Out The Traitors And Restore The Han. If I Should Let You Down, Punish My Offense And Report It To The Spirit Of The Late Emperor.

Your Majesty, Consider Your Course Of Action Carefully. Seek Out Good Advice, And Never Forget The Late Words Of The Late Emperor. I Depart Now On A Long Expedition, And I Will Be Forever Grateful If You Heed My Advice. Blinded By My Own Tears, I Know Not What I Write.

Windwing - Northern Expedition Memorial * ZhuGeLiang

Windwing - Northern Expedition Memorial * ZhuGeLiang

2017-12-14

12.13 National Memorial Day

Nanking 80th Weep's Day

Windwing - 12.13 National Memorial Day * Nanking 80th

Engrave On Our's Mind In The Name Of The Nation
Windwing - 12.13 National Memorial Day * Nanking 80th

Sorry, I Can't Save You,But I Won't Forget You!
Windwing - 12.13 National Memorial Day * Nanking 80th

Chaos On The Year Of 1937,
May You Have A Beautiful Time In The Future On 2017.
Windwing - 12.13 National Memorial Day * Nanking 80th


If One Day We Can Meet,
I Will Tell You,
The Mountains And Rivers Are Still In,And The National Peace Now.
Windwing - 12.13 National Memorial Day * Nanking 80th

2017-10-23

J20:The Blue Shadow Fighter

The Stealthy Chinese Fighter J20 Appeared To Upon The Stage And Become A Newest Ruthless Role In The Blue Sky.

The J20, Designed And Built In China, Is The Country's First Stealth Fighter And The PLA's Mostadvanced Military Jet.
Windwing - J20:The Blue Shadow Fighter
Front View Of J20 Is Awesome, Very Evil, This Bird Should Be The Standard Equipment Of Darkforce In Future Science Fiction Movies.
Windwing - J20:The Blue Shadow Fighter

Windwing - J20:The Blue Shadow Fighter

Windwing - J20:The Blue Shadow Fighter

Windwing - J20:The Blue Shadow Fighter

Windwing - J20:The Blue Shadow Fighter
The J20 Stealth Fighter Taking To The Air Using China Own Indigenous Engines Is Significant.
Windwing - J20:The Blue Shadow Fighter

According To The Pentagon Report, Defence Experts Do Not Expect The J20 Stealth Fighter To Achieve "Effective Operational Capability Prior To 2018".










2017-08-01

PLA Military Parade Focuses On Combat Readiness

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1058735.shtml

PLA Military Parade Focuses On Combat Readiness

Soldiers hold (from left) the flag of the People's Liberation Army, the Chinese national flag, and the flag of the Communist Party of China during a military parade on Sunday to mark the 90th founding anniversary of the PLA in Zhurihe, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Photo: Xinhua



China on Sunday held a grand military parade in Zhurihe, China's biggest military training base, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, in the run up to the 90th founding anniversary of the People's Liberation Army.

President Xi Jinping, who is also general secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and chairman of the Central Military Commission, reviewed the formations of soldiers before a display of China's state-of-the-art weaponry.

Unlike previous military parades held in Beijing, where many of the participants were honor guards, the 12,000 participants of Sunday's event were all from combat brigades, from the PLA's Army, Navy, Air Force, Rocket Force, Strategic Support Force, Armed Police, and other services.

Formalities were kept to the minimum to focus on the PLA's combat readiness to safeguard the country.

99A tanks, Dongfeng-series missiles and the J-20 stealth fighter plane were among the weaponry showcased at the parade, half of which were revealed in the public for the first time.

Addressing the soldiers, Xi said the fundamental principle of the Party's absolute leadership of the military must be upheld, and urged the PLA to enhance modernization through reform, technology and the law.

Global Times

J-20 stealth fighter planes fly over the parade ground. Photo: Xinhua

A formation of 99A tanks rolls over in the parade. Photo: Xinhua



Soldiers shout slogans during the inspection. Photo: Xinhua

Military helicopters fly over tanks and rocket launch vehicles during the parade. Photo: Xinhua


2017-07-31

Why Tiny Bhutan Remains The Wild Card In China’s Border Stand-off With India

http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2104417/why-tiny-bhutan-remains-wild-card-chinas-border-standoff

Why tiny Bhutan remains the wild card in China's border stand-off with India

Ankit Panda writes that each choice Bhutan makes during the protracted China-India dispute could chart its place in Asia for decades to come

By  Ankit Panda
Wiudwing - India Invasion
For more than a month now, Indian and Chinese troops have been caught up in a stand-off on an obscure piece of Himalayan territory known as Doklam, which is disputed between Bhutan and China. The fundamental question is the location of the so-called triboundary point – where all three countries meet.

A range of factors have made this incident the most serious such stand-off between the two nuclear-armed Asian giants, who are no strangers to border incidents. Both saw serious encounters in 2013 and 2014 in the Kashmir sector of their disputed border.

First, from the Chinese perspective, the Indian army transgressed international norms by crossing what is seen as a settled international boundary to intervene on territory disputed between a third country and China. This is the first time Indian troops have engaged China from the soil of a third country.

Wiudwing - India Invasion

China was seemingly taken aback by the Indian Army's response in mid-June, which it claims involved the bulldozing of certain road features it had already constructed. In the weeks since, China's official reaction, accompanied by state media, has suggested a state of frenzy, with frequent references to the "lesson" of 1962, when China defeated India in a major war.

Second, in the Indian view, matters are more subtle. New Delhi concurs that it and Beijing have agreed that the Himalayan ridge line in the area should form the basis of a final border, but that border has yet to be finally demarcated and delineated.

From the Indian perspective too, there is ample reason for the intervention. The People's Liberation Army's alleged plans to extend a road – the spark for the stand-off – was seen as both threatening to India's security interests in the region and Bhutan's sovereignty.

Third, India and Bhutan have maintained a special relationship where Delhi exercised considerable persuasive power over the small Himalayan kingdom's foreign and security policy from 1949 on, under a treaty of friendship. That agreement was revisited in 2007 to grant the Bhutanese great autonomy as the kingdom transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a parliamentary monarchy.

Caught between two giants, Bhutan, with the exception of issuing a demarche to Beijing and a short statement, has maintained its silence.

As July 2017 comes to a close, the situation at Doklam appears to be stable and tense, with neither side likely to escalate matters soon. India continues to defy a Chinese ultimatum that diplomacy can only take place once Indian troops withdraw to their side of the Himalayan ridge line.

If China does escalate, it may choose to do so in another sector. Perhaps China's military may take steps to seize territory on the Indian side of the Line of Actual Control in eastern Ladakh. In the meantime, the longer the stand-off persists, the more unilateral drawdown becomes an unappetising loss of face for either side.

Neither of these proud and rising Asian powers wants to be seen as capitulating in a scenario where both sides are convinced of the fundamental righteousness of their positions. Ultimately, it comes down to complex hermeneutics around a 1890 convention between British India and the Qing Empire and subsequent agreements, including a non-public 2012 agreement in which India claims China would agree to resolve outstanding triboundary disputes in consultation with the concerned third parties – Bhutan, in this case.

Bhutan, China's only neighbour with which it has no diplomatic ties, has engaged in 24 rounds of border negotiations with Beijing. Doklam is not the only sector where Bhutan and China have disputes and, while the sector matters immensely for India, where it is seen as a natural bulwark against the PLA's access to the vulnerable Siliguri corridor, for Bhutan, there are good reasons to allow favourable concessions to China at Doklam.

In 2005, Bhutan, then still obliged to defer to Delhi on matters of foreign and security policy, reportedly had made important unilateral concessions toward China that left Indian policymakers livid. Though the exact offer remains secret, it is likely that Beijing offered to settle for a small concession at Doklam in exchange for Bhutan's gaining a wider swathe of territory in the north and east.

Though the 2005 matter was hardly reported and managed carefully between India and Bhutan behind the scenes, it leaves the sense that Thimphu is the key to the ongoing stand-off. If the PLA's move to extend the road in June was more than tactical, it may have sought to highlight the growing schism between India and one of its closest allies and neighbours.

Bhutan's incentives to defect on the Doklam question will now receive intense attention during next year's parliamentary elections in the country too. If the India-China stand-off lasts through the winter – and it will likely last a good deal longer as China's 19th Party Congress approaches – the matter could grow increasingly uncomfortable for India.

And so the stand-off at Doklam will simmer on between India, China and Bhutan, likely maintaining its ongoing ossified state well into the winter of 2017. For India and China, the Doklam stand-off has metastasised into another bit of geopolitical competition between two aspirational giants.

For tiny Bhutan in the meantime, each choice made during this stand-off could well end up charting its place in Asia for decades to come.










*********************************************************************************************

Go Back! 
Assam Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Tripura Ladakh Kashmir Sikkim Bhutan Nepal,Maybe Only The Himalayas Can Stop India's Nibble Up China's Tibet .





2017-07-30

The Fall Of India:How India-China Border Row Brought New Delhi To Its Knees

http://www.valuewalk.com/2017/07/india-china-border-war

The Fall Of India: How India-China Border Row Brought New Delhi To Its Knees

India has been brought down to its knees by China over the India-China border row, but is this the collapse of New Delhi?

As Indian and Chinese troops remain locked in a heated India-China border row, India's stubborn position could lead to an all-out war between the world's two most populous nations. While tensions between New Delhi and Beijing show no signs of going away, the border dispute that flared up last month could become an existential catastrophe for India, if the conflict evolves into war.

Wiudwing - The Fall Of India
ThePixelman / Pixabay

The India-China border dispute began in June when Beijing ordered to construct a road in its disputed area with Bhutan, the Doklam Plateau in Tibet. Bhutan is a small kingdom run under the influence of India – its major ally – but its borders do not have any contact with India, which sent its troops into Bhutan to prevent the road's construction. New Delhi views the road construction as Beijing asserting sovereignty and further expanding its hegemony in the region.

In what has become the worst stand-off between Chinese and Indian troops on the borderline in decades, there is no end to the conflict in sight. India refuses to withdraw its troops from the territory, while China says there will be no negotiations until after India troops have left the territory.

India Stubborn in the India-China Border Row: Will History Repeat Itself?

Although the two nations have engaged in the India-China borderline rows for many decades – and even fought the Sino-Indian war in 1962, which ended in India's humiliating defeat – it is surprising to many that New Delhi is willing to risk another war with the world's largest military over a border dispute in Bhutan.

After all, China's annual defense spending dwarfs India's, $216 billion to $56 billion. One can argue that New Delhi is in no position to dictate its own rules, but the Indian side continues stubbornly standing its ground.

Fears of an India-China war keep mounting, as Beijing has made it crystal clear that it will not sit at one table with the Indians if their troops do not leave the disputed territory. After all, Indian soldiers were the first ones to enter the Doklam Plateau illegally, which ignited the heated border row between the two nations in the first place. While New Delhi insists it was trying to stop China from asserting sovereignty on the disputed area, Beijing further tightened its grip on the area by sending more troops and is adamant to not give up.

If China's position in the South China Sea is any indication, Beijing always goes the extra mile to get what it wants when it comes to protecting its national interests. The Chinese government has even reportedly moved a number of military gear to the border to be better equipped for any solution of the India-China border row, including a military one.

However, if the Chinese do resort to force, history may repeat itself. But India has so much more to lose in 2017 than it did in 1962.

China vs. India War on the Horizon, as Beijing will Protect its Interests At 'Any Cost'

Despite China clearly having an edge in pretty much all fields of the military, India is reportedly stepping up military preparations on the borderline. While the Chinese and Indian soldiers have not fired a single bullet yet, the border row could escalate quickly, as it did in 1962. Interestingly, a road construction was one of the triggers that led to the devastating Sino-Indian war more than five decades ago.

Although New Delhi and Beijing have been reportedly communicating with each other through various diplomatic channels, the two nations still continue building up forces along the border. Earlier this week, Chinese state-run newspaper Global Times insisted that China would safeguard its security interests at "any cost" as its sovereignty was "indomitable" in the India-China border row.

If India and China resort to weapons to resolve the border dispute in Bhutan, it is fair to say that a war between the world's two most populous countries – with over 2.6 billion people combined – would be the most devastating and catastrophic in history. If the two arch rivals use nuclear weapons, the consequences would be deadly for the whole world, not just Asia.

China's nuclear arsenal accounts for more than 270 nuclear warheads, while New Delhi owns about 130 nuclear missiles, according to recent estimations by the Arms Control Association.

Pakistan Joining China Would Be a Catastrophe for India

At this point, China seems adamant to take any measures to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity in the India-China border row, which is the worst stand-off between the two countries in decades. A potential military confrontation between the two key Asian powers could pose not only a major threat to the stability and safety of South Asia, but also spill over and become a global catastrophe.

India seems stubborn in its position to not withdraw troops from the Doklam Plateau, as such a decision would paint the nation as weak and unable to stand its ground. Being viewed as weak is the last thing New Delhi wants at the time when there is a risk of losing territory claims on the northwestern border with Pakistan.

Pakistan, which has engaged in separate territorial disputes with India, and China are long-time allies and their diplomatic, economic and military cooperation has soared over the past years. If China taking up weapons against India would be enough trouble for the Indians, Pakistan joining its long-time ally would be a catastrophe for New Delhi.

Indian Muslims Could Bring the Fall of India

India, which could be on the verge of an internal crisis over the growing anger of Muslims in the Hinduism-majority country, is not willing to back off in the India-China border row. But if New Delhi does not withdraw its troops from the disputed area to lay out the groundwork for negotiations with China, the consequences could be tragic for the 1.324 billion-populated country.

Earlier this week, Indian Muslims woke up to the brutal realization that a Muslim genocide may be happening in India, where roughly 172 million people living in India identify themselves as adherents of Islam. A disturbing video showing about a dozen men barbarically lynching a Muslim man leaked on the Internet.

There is an ongoing debate about the identity of the victim. With Indian media and police claiming it was a gangster, who was killed by a rival gang, international journalists believe it was a Muslim bodybuilder, who was brutally killed in a gruesome religion-motivated assault.

Earlier this month, the Indian Express published a lengthy op-ed called "Inside the mind of the Indian Muslim," where it said that the Indian Muslims are "cornered and demonized" and dealing with "a silent, undeclared psychological war that the State has unleashed on it." The article detailed how Indian Muslims are living in constant fear in the nation, where lynching of Muslim people have reportedly been on the rise lately.

In addition to the volatile external crisis on the India-China border, New Delhi could also be dealing with an internal one. If those millions of Muslims living in India rise in revolt against the alleged Muslim genocide, it could become the fall of New Delhi.





*********************************************************************************************

Assam Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Tripura Ladakh Kashmir Sikkim Bhutan Nepal,Maybe Only The Himalayas Can Stop India's Nibble Up China's Tibet .






British Have Invaded Nine Out Of Ten Countries - So Look Out Luxembourg

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/9653497/British-have-invaded-nine-out-of-ten-countries-so-look-out-Luxembourg.html

British Have Invaded Nine Out Of Ten Countries - So Look Out Luxembourg

Britain has invaded all but 22 countries in the world in its long and colourful history, new research has found.

21 of the 22 countries that have not been invaded by Britain

Every schoolboy used to know that at the height of the empire, almost a quarter of the atlas was coloured pink, showing the extent of British rule.

But that oft recited fact dramatically understates the remarkable global reach achieved by this country.

A new study has found that at various times the British have invaded almost 90 per cent of the countries around the globe.

The analysis of the histories of the almost 200 countries in the world found only 22 which have never experienced an invasion by the British.

Among this select group of nations are far-off destinations such as Guatemala, Tajikistan and the Marshall Islands, as well some slightly closer to home, such as Luxembourg.

The analysis is contained in a new book, All the Countries We've Ever Invaded: And the Few We Never Got Round To.

Stuart Laycock, the author, has worked his way around the globe, through each country alphabetically, researching its history to establish whether, at any point, they have experienced an incursion by Britain.

Only a comparatively small proportion of the total in Mr Laycock's list of invaded states actually formed an official part of the empire.

The remainder have been included because the British were found to have achieved some sort of military presence in the territory – however transitory – either through force, the threat of force, negotiation or payment.

Incursions by British pirates, privateers or armed explorers have also been included, provided they were operating with the approval of their government.

So, many countries which once formed part of the Spanish empire and seem to have little historical connection with the UK, such as Costa Rica, Ecuador and El Salvador, make the list because of the repeated raids they suffered from state-sanctioned British sailors.

Among some of the perhaps surprising entries on the list are:

* Cuba, where in 1741, a force under Admiral Edward Vernon stormed ashore at Guantánamo Bay. He renamed it Cumberland Bay, before being forced to withdraw in the face of hostile locals and an outbreak of disease among his men. Twenty one years later, Havana and a large part of the island fell to the British after a bloody siege, only to be handed back to the Spanish in 1763, along with another unlikely British possession, the Philippines, in exchange for Florida and Minorca.

*Iceland, invaded in 1940 by the British after the neutral nation refused to enter the war on the Allies side. The invasion force, of 745 marines, met with strong protest from the Iceland government, but no resistance.

* Vietnam, which has experienced repeated incursions by the British since the seventeenth century. The most recent – from 1945 to 1946 – saw the British fight a campaign for control of the country against communists, in a war that has been overshadowed by later conflicts involving first the French and then Americans.

It is thought to be the first time such a list has been compiled.

Mr Laycock, who has previously published books on Roman history, began the unusual quest after being asked by his 11-year-old son, Frederick, how many countries the British had invaded.

After almost two years of research he said he was shocked by the answer. "I was absolutely staggered when I reached the total. I like to think I have a relatively good general knowledge. But there are places where it hadn't occurred to me that these things had ever happened. It shocked me.

"Other countries could write similar books – but they would be much shorter. I don't think anyone could match this, although the Americans had a later start and have been working hard on it in the twentieth century."

The only other nation which has achieved anything approaching the British total, Mr Laycock said, is France – which also holds the unfortunate record for having endured the most British invasions. "I realise people may argue with some of my reasons, but it is intended to prompt debate," he added.

He believes the actual figure may well be higher and is inviting the public to get in touch to provide evidence of other invasions.

In the case of Mongolia, for instance – one of the 22 nations "not invaded", according to the book – he believes it possible that there could have been a British invasion, but could find no direct proof.

The country was caught up in the turmoil following the Russian Revolution, in which the British and other powers intervened. Mr Laycock found evidence of a British military mission in Russia approximately 50 miles from the Mongolian border, but could not establish whether it got any closer.

The research lists countries based on their current national boundaries and names. Many of the invasions took place when these did not apply.

The research covered the 192 other UN member states as well as the Vatican City and Kosovo, which are not member states, but are recognised by the UK government as independent states.

The earliest invasion launched from these islands was an incursion into Gaul – now France – at the end of the second century. Clodius Albinus led an army, thought to include many Britons, across the Channel in an attempt to seize the imperial throne. The force was defeated in 197 at Lyon.

Mr Laycock added: "On one level, for the British, it is quite amazing and quite humbling, that this is all part of our history, but clearly there are parts of our history that we are less proud of. The book is not intended as any kind of moral judgement on our history or our empire. It is meant as a light-hearted bit of fun."

The countries never invaded by the British:

Andorra

Belarus

Bolivia

Burundi

Central African Republic

Chad

Congo, Republic of

Guatemala

Ivory Coast

Kyrgyzstan

Liechtenstein

Luxembourg

Mali

Marshall Islands

Monaco

Mongolia

Paraguay

Sao Tome and Principe

Sweden

Tajikistan

Uzbekistan

Vatican City



2017-07-27

China' New Chick

http://indiatodaynews.org/chinas-new-chick-how-china-is-buying-out-pakistan-with-massive-new-investments-and-why-india-needs-to-worry
Windwing - China' New Chick

China's New Chick : How China is buying out Pakistan with massive new investments and why India needs to worry
China's proposed infrastructural project running through PoK aims to take over Pakistan's economy.
India Today examines China's relations with Pakistan, and how the Chinese government is slowly taking over the Pakistani economy through massive investments in various sectors.


*********************************************************************************************

Assam Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Tripura Ladakh Kashmir Sikkim Bhutan Nepal,Maybe Only The Himalayas Can Stop India's Nibble Up China's Tibet .